Paper detail

Critical Database Size for Effective Caching

Replicating or caching popular content in memories distributed across the network is a technique to reduce peak network loads. Conventionally, the performance gain of caching was thought to result from making part of the requested data available closer to end users. Recently, it has been shown that by using a carefully designed technique to store the contents in the cache and coding across data streams a much more significant gain can be achieved in reducing the network load. Inner and outer bounds on the network load v/s cache memory tradeoff were obtained in (Maddah-Ali and Niesen, 2012). We give an improved outer bound on the network load v/s cache memory tradeoff. We address the question of to what extent caching is effective in reducing the server load when the number of files becomes large as compared to the number of users. We show that the effectiveness of caching become small when the number of files becomes comparable to the square of the number of users.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.