Paper detail

Critical current densities and microstructures in Rod-in-Tube and Tube Type Nb3Sn strands - Present status and prospects for improvement

In this work, the transport and magnetization properties of distributed-barrier Rod-in-Tube (RIT) strands and Tube Type strands are studied. While Tube Type strands had smaller magnetizations and thus better stabilities in the low field region, their 12 T non-Cu Jcs were somewhat smaller than those of the RIT strands. Microstructures were investigated in order to find out the reasons for the difference in non-Cu Jc values. Their grain size and stoichiometry were found to be comparable, leading to similar layer Jcs. Accordingly it was determined that the lower A15 area fraction rather than the quality of A15 layer was the cause of the discrepancy in non-Cu Jc. Subsequently, the area utilizations of subelements were investigated. While for a RIT strand the fine grain (FG) A15 area occupies ~60% of a subelement, for a Tube Type strand it is no more than 40%. Further analysis indicates that the low FG area fraction in a Tube Type strand is attributed to its much larger unreacted Nb area fraction. Finally, a simple change in strand architecture is proposed to reduce the unreacted Nb area fraction.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.