Paper detail

Critical analysis of radical scavenging properties of atorvastatin in methanol recently estimated via density functional theory

In this communication we draw attention on serious flaws that plague recently reported antioxidant properties of atorvastatin (ATV) in methanol. First and foremost, we emphasize that the O-H bond dissociation energies (BDE) of about 400\,kcal/mol previously reported are completely wrong. Further, we present results refuting the previous claim that the proton affinity (PA) of ATV is smaller than that of the ascorbic acid. That unfounded claim relies on incorrect data for PA's ascorbic acid (which we correct here) circulated in the literature. Further, we correct the values of the chemical reactivity indices (e.g., chemical hardness, electrophilicity index, electroaccepting and electrodonating powers), which were inadequately estimated previously via Kohn-Sham HOMO and LUMO energies. Finally, our updated values for \ce{O-H} bond dissociation enthalpy (BDE = 91.4\,kcal/mol) and electron transfer enthalpy (ETE = 105.7\,kcal/mol) tentatively suggest that direct H-atom transfer (HAT) and sequential proton loss electron transfer (SPLET) may coexist.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.