Paper detail

Critical analysis of a variational method used to describe the molecular electron transport

In a recent paper [I.\ Bâldea and H.\ Köppel, \prb {\bf 78}, 115315 (2008)], we showed that a variational approach [P.\ Delaney and J.\ C.\ Greer, \prl {\bf 93}, 036805 (2004)] proposed to compute the electron transport through molecules, which is based on boundary constraints of the Wigner function, is unable to correctly describe the zero-bias conductance of the simplest uncorrelated and correlated systems. In the present paper, we extend our previous analysis of the linear response limit of that approach, by considering, instead of the Wigner function, general constraints. We demonstrate that, if, as usual in transport theories, the quasi-particle distributions in electrodes are constrained, this method yields the completely unphysical result that the zero-bias conductance vanishes. Therefore, we conclude that the variational approach itself is defective.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.