Paper detail

Criterion for the Buchstaber invariant of simplicial complexes to be equal to two

In this paper we study the Buchstaber invariant of simplicial complexes, which comes from toric topology. With each simplicial complex $K$ on $m$ vertices we can associate a moment-angle complex $\mathcal Z_K$ with a canonical action of the compact torus $T^m$. Then $s(K)$ is the maximal dimension of a toric subgroup that acts freely on $\mathcal Z_K$. We develop the Buchstaber invariant theory from the viewpoint of the set of minimal non-simplices of $K$. It is easy to show that $s(K)=1$ if and only if any two and any three minimal non-simplices intersect. For $K=\partial P^*$, where $P$ is a simple polytope, this implies that $P$ is a simplex. The case $s(P)=2$ is such more complicated. For example, for any $k\geqslant 2$ there exists an $n$-polytope with $n+k$ facets such that $s(P)=2$. Our main result is the criterion for the Buchstaber invariant of a simplicial complex $K$ to be equal to two.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.