Paper detail

Criteria for extensional necking instability in complex fluids and soft solids. Part I: imposed Hencky strain rate protocol

We study the necking dynamics of a filament of complex fluid or soft solid in uniaxial tensile stretching at constant imposed Hencky strain rate $\dot\varepsilon$, by means of linear stability analysis and nonlinear (slender filament) simulations. We demonstrate necking to be an intrinsic flow instability that arises as an inevitable consequence of the constitutive behaviour of essentially any material (with a possible rare exception, which we outline). We derive criteria for the onset of necking that are reportable simply in terms of characteristic signatures in the shapes of the experimentally measured rheological response functions, and should therefore apply universally to all materials. As evidence of their generality, we numerically show them to hold in six popular constitutive models of polymers and soft glasses. Two distinct modes of necking instability are predicted. The first is relatively gentle, and sets in when the tensile stress signal first curves down as a function of the time $t$ (or accumulated strain $ε=\dot\varepsilon t$) since the inception of the flow. The second is more violent, and sets in when a carefully defined `elastic derivative' of the tensile force first slopes down as a function of $t$ (or $\dot\varepsilon$). In the limit of fast flow $\dot\varepsilonτ\to\infty$, where $τ$ is the material's characteristic stress relaxation time, this second mode reduces to the Considére criterion for necking in solids. However we show that the Considére criterion fails to correctly predict the onset of necking in any viscoelastic regime of finite imposed $\dot\varepsilonτ$. Finally, we elucidate the way these modes of instability manifest themselves in entangled linear polymers, wormlike micelles and branched polymers. We demonstrate four distinct regimes as a function of imposed strain rate, consistent with experimental master curves.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.