Paper detail

CREIME: A Convolutional Recurrent model for Earthquake Identification and Magnitude Estimation

The detection and rapid characterisation of earthquake parameters such as magnitude are of prime importance in seismology, particularly in applications such as Earthquake Early Warning (EEW). Traditionally, algorithms such as STA/LTA are used for event detection, while frequency or amplitude domain parameters calculated from 1-3 seconds of first P-arrival data are sometimes used to provide a first estimate of (body wave) magnitude. Owing to extensive involvement of human experts in parameter determination, these approaches are often found to be insufficient. Moreover, these methods are sensitive to the signal to noise ratio and may often lead to false or missed alarms depending on the choice of parameters. We, therefore, propose a multitasking deep learning model the Convolutional Recurrent model for Earthquake Identification and Magnitude Estimation (CREIME) that: (i) detects the first earthquake signal, from background seismic noise, (ii) determines first P arrival time as well as (iii) estimates the magnitude using the raw 3-component waveform data from a single station as model input. Considering, speed is of essence in EEW, we use up to two seconds of P-wave information which, to the best of our knowledge, is a significantly smaller data window (5 second window with up to of P wave data) compared to the previous studies. To examine the robustness of CREIME we test it on two independent datasets and find that it achieves an average accuracy of 98 percent for event vs noise discrimination and is able to estimate first P arrival time and local magnitude with average root mean squared errors of 0.13 seconds and 0.65 units, respectively. We also compare CREIME architecture with architectures of other baseline models, by training them on the same data, and also with traditional algorithms such as STA/LTA, and show that our architecture outperforms these methods.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.