Paper detail

Creep-fatigue interactions in a polycrystalline structural material under typical high-temperature power plant operating conditions

A micromechanical model at the microscale within a crystal plasticity self-consistent model, is used to analyse loading histories in Type 316H stainless steel, common to structural components in high-temperature power plants. The study compares the SCM predictions on changes in mechanical behaviour and creep properties to analyses via the UK R5 structural assessment code. Plant-relevant cyclic-creep histories in Type 316H stainless steel at 550C are examined with focus on the estimation of accumulated creep strain. This aims to quantify how better understanding of creep deformation under cyclic loading can inform R5 code life assessment methods, which are strain based. The effect of cyclic plasticity on primary and secondary creep is quantified. The levels of creep strain accumulated during different dwells, following loading from different macroscopic stress states, is also evaluated and link is made to experimental observations in explaining the response. The impact of displacement- and load-controlled dwells on the evolution of the cyclic hysteresis loop is examined which revealed how different assumptions for creep strain accumulation could employ information from SCM results to reduce uncertainty. It also provides guidance in the development of interpolation frameworks for structural parameters, based on the SCM results which could be used directly in structural assessment and design approaches to estimate the accumulation of inelastic strain with a lower degree of conservatism.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.