Paper detail

Creating Jackknife and Bootstrap estimates of the covariance matrix for the two-point correlation function

We present correction terms that allow delete-one Jackknife and Bootstrap methods to be used to recover unbiased estimates of the data covariance matrix of the two-point correlation function $ξ\left(\mathbf{r}\right)$. We demonstrate the accuracy and precision of this new method using a large set of 1000 QUIJOTE simulations that each cover a comoving volume of $1\rm{\left[h^{-1}Gpc\right]^3}$. The corrected resampling techniques recover the correct amplitude and structure of the data covariance matrix as represented by its principal components to within $\sim10$\%, the level of error achievable with the size of the sample of simulations used for the test. Our corrections for the internal resampling methods are shown to be robust against the intrinsic clustering of the cosmological tracers both in real- and redshift space using two snapshots at $z=0$ and $z=1$ that mimic two samples with significantly different clustering. We also analyse two different slicing of the simulation volume into $n_{\rm sv}=64$ or $125$ sub-samples and show that the main impact of different $n_{\rm sv}$ is on the structure of the covariance matrix due to the limited number of independent internal realisations that can be made given a fixed $n_{\rm sv}$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.