Paper detail

Craters on Charon: Impactors From a Collisional Cascade Among Trans-Neptunian Objects

We consider whether equilibrium size distributions from collisional cascades match the frequency of impactors derived from New Horizons crater counts on Charon (Singer et al 2019). Using an analytic model and a suite of numerical simulations, we demonstrate that collisional cascades generate wavy size distributions; the morphology of the waves depends on the binding energy of solids $Q_d^\star$ and the collision velocity $v_c$. For an adopted minimum size of solids, $r_{min}$ = 1 micron, and collision velocity $v_c$ = 1-3 km/sec, the waves are rather insensitive to the gravitational component of $Q_d^\star$. If the bulk strength component of $Q_d^\star$ is $Q_s r^{e_s}$ for particles with radius $r$, size distributions with small $Q_s$ are much wavier than those with large $Q_s$; systems with $e_s \approx -0.4$ have stronger waves than systems with $e_s \approx 0$. Detailed comparisons with the New Horizons data suggest that a collisional cascade among solids with a bulk strength intermediate between weak ice (Leinhardt & Stewart 2012) and normal ice (Schlichting et al 2013) produces size distributions fairly similar to the size distribution of impactors on Charon. If the surface density $Σ$ of the protosolar nebula varies with semimajor axis $a$ as $Σ\approx 30~{\rm g~cm^{-2}} (a / {\rm 1~au})^{-3/2}$, the time scale for a cascade to generate an approximate equilibrium is 100-300 Myr at 45 au and 10-30 Myr at 25 au. Although it is necessary to perform more complete evolutionary calculations of the Kuiper belt, collisional cascades are a viable model for producing the size distribution of solids that impacted Charon throughout its history.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.