Paper detail

Cramér's theorem is atypical

The empirical mean of $n$ independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables $(X_1,\dots,X_n)$ can be viewed as a suitably normalized scalar projection of the $n$-dimensional random vector $X^{(n)}\doteq(X_1,\dots,X_n)$ in the direction of the unit vector $n^{-1/2}(1,1,\dots,1) \in \mathbb{S}^{n-1}$. The large deviation principle (LDP) for such projections as $n\rightarrow\infty$ is given by the classical Cramér's theorem. We prove an LDP for the sequence of normalized scalar projections of $X^{(n)}$ in the direction of a generic unit vector $θ^{(n)} \in \mathbb{S}^{n-1}$, as $n\rightarrow\infty$. This LDP holds under fairly general conditions on the distribution of $X_1$, and for "almost every" sequence of directions $(θ^{(n)})_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$. The associated rate function is "universal" in the sense that it does not depend on the particular sequence of directions. Moreover, under mild additional conditions on the law of $X_1$, we show that the universal rate function differs from the Cramér rate function, thus showing that the sequence of directions $n^{-1/2}(1,1,\dots,1) \in \mathbb{S}^{n-1},$ $n \in \mathbb{N}$, corresponding to Cramér's theorem is atypical.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.