Paper detail

CP Violation in the Exclusive Decays B -> pi e^+e^- and B -> rho e^+e^-

As a sequel to the calculation of the CP-violating asymmetry in the decay rates of b -> d l^+l^- and \bar{b} -> \bar{d} l^+l^-, we address in this paper the asymmetry in exclusive channels \bar{B} -> pi e^+e^- and \bar{B} -> rho e^+e^-, using form factors from two different models. In the invariant mass region 1GeV < \sqrt{s} < M_{J/psi}, the partial width asymmetry in the channel \bar{B} -> pi is -6% (-2%), and that in the channel \bar{B} -> rho, for one choice of form factors, is -5% (-2%), assuming CKM parameters eta = 0.34, rho = 0.3 (-0.3). We also calculate the forward-backward asymmetry A_{FB} of the e^- in the e^+e^- centre-of-mass system, and find average values <A_{FB}>(\bar{B} -> pi) \equiv 0, <A_{FB}>(\bar{B} -> rho)= -17 %, to be compared with the inclusive result <A_{FB}>(b -> d)= -9%. There is a CP-violating difference between A_{FB} and the corresponding asymmetry in the antiparticle channel \bar{A}_{FB}. Formulae are given that are applicable to any FCNC channel \bar{B} -> P_q (V_q) l^+l^-, q=s, d, with m_l \neq 0, including lepton spin effects. An approximate procedure is used to incorporate the rho, omega, and J/psi resonances.

preprint1997arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.