Paper detail

CP violation in bipair neutrino mixing

There are experimentally determined two best-fit points for the atmospheric neutrino mixing angle $θ_{23}$: $\sin^2 θ_{23} = 0.413$ (case A) and $\sin^2 θ_{23} = 0.594$ (case B). In the bipair neutrino mixing scheme, we predict $\sin^2θ_{23} = \sqrt{2}-1$ (case 1) to be consistent with the case A and $\sin^2θ_{23} = 2-\sqrt{2}$ (case 2) to be consistent with the case B. If the case B is realized in nature, the bipair neutrino mixing provides a unique neutrino model consistent with the observation $\sin^2 θ_{23} = 0.594$. However, the reactor neutrino mixing angle $θ_{13}$ is predicted to be $\sin^2θ_{13} = 0$, which is inconsistent with the observation. We propose a new modification scheme to yield $\sin^2θ_{13} \neq 0$ utilizing the charged lepton contribution and study its effect on both of CP-violating Dirac and Majorana phases, which is numerically estimated. It is found that there appear striking differences between the case 1 and the case 2 in their phase structure.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.