Paper detail

CP Violation in ${\bar B}^0\to D^{*+}μ^-{\barν}_μ$

In order to explain the observed anomalies in the measurements of $R_{D^{(*)}}$ and $R_{J/ψ}$, a variety of new-physics (NP) models that contribute to $b\to cτ^-{\barν}$ have been proposed. In this paper, we show how CP-violating observables can be used to distinguish these NP models. Because ${\vec p}_τ$ cannot be measured (the decay products of the $τ$ include the undetected $ν_τ$), obtaining the angular distribution of ${\bar B}^0\to D^{*+}τ^{-}{\barν}_τ$ is problematic. Instead, we focus here on ${\bar B}^0\to D^{*+}(\to D^0 π^+)μ^- {\barν}_μ$. This process may also receive contributions from the same NP, and LHCb intends to measure the CP-violating angular asymmetries in this decay. There are two classes of NP models that contribute to $b\to cμ^-{\barν}_μ$. These involve (i) a $W'$ (two types) or (ii) a leptoquark (LQ) (six types). The most popular NP models predict no CP-violating effects, so the measurement of nonzero CP-violating symmetries would rule them out. Furthermore these measurements allow one to distinguish the $W'$ and LQ models, and to differentiate among several LQ models.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.