Paper detail

Coxeter groups, imaginary cones and dominance

Brink and Howlett have introduced a partial ordering, called dominance, on the positive roots in the Tits realization of Coxeter groups (Math. Ann. 296 (1993), 179--190). Recently a concept called $\infty$-height is introduced to each reflection in an arbitrary Coxeter group $W$ (Edgar, Dominance and regularity in Coxeter groups, PhD thesis, 2009). It is known (Dyer, unpublished) that for all $W$ of finite rank, and for each non-negative $n$, the set of reflections of $\infty$-height equal to $n$ is finite. However, it is not clear that the concepts of $\infty$-height and dominance are related. Here we show that the $\infty$-height of an arbitrary reflection is equal to the number of positive roots strictly dominated by the positive root corresponding to that reflection. We also give applications of dominance to the study of imaginary cones of Coxeter groups.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.