Paper detail

Covering Cubes and the Closest Vector Problem

We provide the currently fastest randomized (1+epsilon)-approximation algorithm for the closest vector problem in the infinity norm. The running time of our method depends on the dimension n and the approximation guarantee epsilon by 2^O(n) (log 1/epsilon)^O(n)$ which improves upon the (2+1/epsilon)^O(n) running time of the previously best algorithm by Blömer and Naewe. Our algorithm is based on a solution of the following geometric covering problem that is of interest of its own: Given epsilon in (0,1), how many ellipsoids are necessary to cover the cube [-1+epsilon, 1-epsilon]^n such that all ellipsoids are contained in the standard unit cube [-1,1]^n? We provide an almost optimal bound for the case where the ellipsoids are restricted to be axis-parallel. We then apply our covering scheme to a variation of this covering problem where one wants to cover [-1+epsilon,1-epsilon]^n with parallelepipeds that, if scaled by two, are still contained in the unit cube. Thereby, we obtain a method to boost any 2-approximation algorithm for closest-vector in the infinity norm to a (1+epsilon)-approximation algorithm that has the desired running time.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.