Paper detail

Coverage processes on spheres and condition numbers for linear programming

This paper has two agendas. Firstly, we exhibit new results for coverage processes. Let $p(n,m,α)$ be the probability that $n$ spherical caps of angular radius $α$ in $S^m$ do not cover the whole sphere $S^m$. We give an exact formula for $p(n,m,α)$ in the case $α\in[π/2,π]$ and an upper bound for $p(n,m,α)$ in the case $α\in [0,π/2]$ which tends to $p(n,m,π/2)$ when $α\toπ/2$. In the case $α\in[0,π/2]$ this yields upper bounds for the expected number of spherical caps of radius $α$ that are needed to cover $S^m$. Secondly, we study the condition number ${\mathscr{C}}(A)$ of the linear programming feasibility problem $\exists x\in\mathbb{R}^{m+1}Ax\le0,x\ne0$ where $A\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times(m+1)}$ is randomly chosen according to the standard normal distribution. We exactly determine the distribution of ${\mathscr{C}}(A)$ conditioned to $A$ being feasible and provide an upper bound on the distribution function in the infeasible case. Using these results, we show that $\mathbf{E}(\ln{\mathscr{C}}(A))\le2\ln(m+1)+3.31$ for all $n>m$, the sharpest bound for this expectancy as of today. Both agendas are related through a result which translates between coverage and condition.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.