Paper detail

Coupled Thermal and Compositional Evolution of Photo Evaporating Planet Envelopes

Photo-evaporative mass loss sculpts the atmospheric evolution of tightly-orbiting sub-Neptune-mass exoplanets. To date, models of the mass loss from warm Neptunes have assumed that the atmospheric abundances remain constant throughout the planet&#39;s evolution. However, the cumulative effects of billions of years of escape modulated by diffusive separation and preferential loss of hydrogen can lead to planetary envelopes that are enhanced in helium and metals relative to hydrogen (Hu et al. 2015). We have performed the first self-consistent calculations of the coupled thermal, mass-loss, and compositional evolution of hydrogen-helium envelopes surrounding sub-Neptune mass planets. We extended the MESA (Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics) stellar evolution code to model the evolving envelope abundances of photo-evaporating planets. We find that GJ 436b, the planet that originally inspired Hu et al. (2015) to propose the formation of helium enhanced planetary atmospheres, requires a primordial envelope that is too massive to become helium enhanced. Nonetheless, we show that helium enhancement is possible for planets with masses similar to GJ 436b after only several Gyr of mass loss. These planets have $R_p\lesssim 3.00~R_\oplus$, initial $f_{\rm env} < 0.5\%$, irradiation flux $\sim$10$^1$-10$^3$ times that of Earth, and obtain final helium fractions in excess of Y=0.40 in our models. The results of preferential envelope loss may have observable consequences on mass-radius relations and atmospheric spectra for sub-Neptune populations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.