Paper detail

Coupled orbital-thermal evolution of Miranda

Miranda has a unusually high inclination ($I=4.338^\circ$), and its surface reveals signs of past endogenic activity. Investigations of the dynamical aspects of its orbital evolution suggest probable resonant processes, in particular with Umbriel, as an explanation for the present high inclination of Miranda. The tidal heating induced by gravitational interactions can lead to the rise of eccentricities and, consequently, to the increased dissipation of energy inside the satellite and higher internal temperatures. We study here the possible increase in eccentricities caused by orbital resonances and the resulting endogenic heating on Miranda taking into account its temperature dependent rheology. The coupled orbital-thermal evolution model was run with different rheological models and the thermal parameters starting form a cold thermal state, in radiative equilibrium with the environment. For the nominal parameters of the evolution scenarios studied, the resonances were not sufficient to rise neither the eccentricities nor the internal temperatures significantly. Lowest dissipation function $Q$ of around 100 and final eccentricity of $e\approx0.02$ were obtained during the resonance 3:1 with Umbriel.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.