Paper detail

Counts of high-redshift GRBs as probe of primordial non-Gaussianities

We propose to use high-redshift long $γ$-ray bursts (GRBs) as cosmological tools to constrain the amount of primordial non-Gaussianity in the density field. By using numerical, N-body, hydrodynamic, chemistry simulations of different cosmological volumes with various Gaussian and non-Gaussian models, we self-consistently relate the cosmic star formation rate density to the corresponding GRB rate. Assuming that GRBs are fair tracers of cosmic star formation, we find that positive local non-Gaussianities, described in terms of the non-linear parameter, \fnl, might boost significantly the GRB rate at high redshift, $z \gg 6$. Deviations with respect to the Gaussian case account for a few orders of magnitude if \fnl$\sim 1000$, one order of magnitude for \fnl$\sim 100$, and a factor of $\sim 2$ for \fnl$\sim 50$. These differences are found only at large redshift, while at later times the rates tend to converge. Furthermore, a comparison between our predictions and the observed GRB data at $z > 6$ allows to exclude large negative \fnl, consistently with previous works. Future detections of any long GRB at extremely high redshift ($z\sim 15-20$) could favor non-Gaussian scenarios with positive \fnl. More stringent constraints require much larger high-$z$ GRB complete samples, currently not available in literature. By distinguishing the contributions to the GRB rate from the metal-poor population III regime, and the metal-enriched population II-I regime, we conclude that the latter is a more solid tracer of the underlying matter distribution, while the former is strongly dominated by feedback mechanisms from the first, massive, short-lived stars, rather than by possible non-Gaussian fluctuations. This holds quite independently of the assumed population III initial mass function.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.