Paper detail

Counts-in-Cells of subhaloes in the IllustrisTNG simulations: the role of baryonic physics

We present an analysis of the Counts-in-Cells (CiC) statistics of subhaloes in the publicly available IllustrisTNG cosmological simulations (TNG100-1, TNG100-3 and TNG300-3), considering their full and dark-only versions, in redshifts ranging from $z = 0$ to $z=5$, and different cell sizes. We evaluated two CiC models: the gravitational quasi-equilibrium distribution (GQED) and the negative binomial distribution (NBD), both presenting good fits, with small detectable differences in the presence of baryons. Scaling and time dependencies of the best-fit parameters showed similar trends compared with the literature. We derived a matter density-in-cells probability distribution function (PDF), associated with the GQED, which was compared to the PDF given in Uhlemann et al. (2016), for the IllustrisTNG 100-3-Dark run at $z=0$. Our results indicate that the simplest gravithermodynamical assumptions of the GQED model hold in the presence of baryonic dissipation. Interestingly, the smoothed (density-in-cells) version of the GQED is also adequate for describing the dark matter one-point statistics of subhaloes and converges, to subpercentage levels (for an interval of parameters), to the Uhlemann et al. PDF in the high density range.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.