Paper detail

Counting Vacua in Random Landscapes

It is speculated that the correct theory of fundamental physics includes a large landscape of states, which can be described as a potential which is a function of N scalar fields and some number of discrete variables. The properties of such a landscape are crucial in determining key cosmological parameters including the dark energy density, the stability of the vacuum, the naturalness of inflation and the properties of the resulting perturbations, and the likelihood of bubble nucleation events. We codify an approach to landscape cosmology based on specifications of the overall form of the landscape potential and illustrate this approach with a detailed analysis of the properties of N-dimensional Gaussian random landscapes. We clarify the correlations between the different matrix elements of the Hessian at the stationary points of the potential. We show that these potentials generically contain a large number of minima. More generally, these results elucidate how random function theory is of central importance to this approach to landscape cosmology, yielding results that differ substantially from those obtained by treating the matrix elements of the Hessian as independent random variables.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.