Paper detail

Counting spanning trees of the hypercube and its $q$-analogs by explicit block diagonalization

The number of spanning trees of a graph $G$ is called the {\em complexity} of $G$ and is denoted $c(G)$. Let C(n) denote the {\em (binary) hypercube} of dimension $n$. A classical result in enumerative combinatorics (based on explicit diagonalization) states that $c(C(n)) = \prod_{k=2}^n (2k)^{n\choose k}$. In this paper we use the explicit block diagonalization methodology to derive formulas for the complexity of two $q$-analogs of C(n), the {\em nonbinary hypercube} $\Cq(n)$, defined for $q\geq 2$, and the {\em vector space analog of the hypercube} $\Cfq(n)$, defined for prime powers $q$. We consider the nonbinary and vector space analogs of the Boolean algebra. We show the existence, in both cases, of a graded Jordan basis (with respect to the up operator) that is orthogonal (with respect to the standard inner product) and we write down explicit formulas for the ratio of the lengths of the successive vectors in the Jordan chains (i.e., the singular values). With respect to (the normalizations of) these bases the Laplacians of $\Cq(n)$ and $\Cfq(n)$ block diagonalize, with quadratically many distinct blocks in the nonbinary case and linearly many distinct blocks in the vector space case, and with each block an explicitly written down real, symmetric, tridiagonal matrix of known multiplicity and size at most $n+1$. In the nonbinary case we further determine the eigenvalues of the blocks, by explicitly writing out the eigenvectors, yielding an explicit formula for $c(\Cq(n))$ (this proof yields new information even in the binary case). In the vector space case we have been unable to determine the eigenvalues of the blocks but we give a useful formula for $c(\Cfq(n))$ involving "small" determinants (of size at most $n$).

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.