Paper detail

Counting Perfect Matchings as Fast as Ryser

We show that there is a polynomial space algorithm that counts the number of perfect matchings in an $n$-vertex graph in $O^*(2^{n/2})\subset O(1.415^n)$ time. ($O^*(f(n))$ suppresses functions polylogarithmic in $f(n)$).The previously fastest algorithms for the problem was the exponential space $O^*(((1+\sqrt{5})/2)^n) \subset O(1.619^n)$ time algorithm by Koivisto, and for polynomial space, the $O(1.942^n)$ time algorithm by Nederlof. Our new algorithm's runtime matches up to polynomial factors that of Ryser's 1963 algorithm for bipartite graphs. We present our algorithm in the more general setting of computing the hafnian over an arbitrary ring, analogously to Ryser's algorithm for permanent computation. We also give a simple argument why the general exact set cover counting problem over a slightly superpolynomial sized family of subsets of an $n$ element ground set cannot be solved in $O^*(2^{(1-ε_1)n})$ time for any $ε_1>0$ unless there are $O^*(2^{(1-ε_2)n})$ time algorithms for computing an $n\times n$ 0/1 matrix permanent, for some $ε_2>0$ depending only on $ε_1$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.