Paper detail

Counting mountain-valley assignments for flat folds

We develop a combinatorial model of paperfolding for the purposes of enumeration. A planar embedding of a graph is called a {\em crease pattern} if it represents the crease lines needed to fold a piece of paper into something. A {\em flat fold} is a crease pattern which lies flat when folded, i.e. can be pressed in a book without crumpling. Given a crease pattern $C=(V,E)$, a {\em mountain-valley (MV) assignment} is a function $f:E\rightarrow \{$M,V$\}$ which indicates which crease lines are convex and which are concave, respectively. A MV assignment is {\em valid} if it doesn't force the paper to self-intersect when folded. We examine the problem of counting the number of valid MV assignments for a given crease pattern. In particular we develop recursive functions that count the number of valid MV assignments for {\em flat vertex folds}, crease patterns with only one vertex in the interior of the paper. We also provide examples, especially those of Justin, that illustrate the difficulty of the general multivertex case.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.