Paper detail

Counting invariant subspaces and decompositions of additive polynomials

The functional (de)composition of polynomials is a topic in pure and computer algebra with many applications. The structure of decompositions of (suitably normalized) polynomials f(x) = g(h(x)) in F[x] over a field F is well understood in many cases, but less well when the degree of f is divisible by the positive characteristic p of F. This work investigates the decompositions of r-additive polynomials, where every exponent and also the field size is a power of r, which itself is a power of p. The decompositions of an r-additive polynomial f are intimately linked to the Frobenius-invariant subspaces of its root space V in the algebraic closure of F. We present an efficient algorithm to compute the rational Jordan form of the Frobenius automorphism on V. A formula of Fripertinger (2011) then counts the number of Frobenius-invariant subspaces of a given dimension and we derive the number of decompositions with prescribed degrees.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.