Paper detail

Counting Invariant Curves: a theory of Gopakumar-Vafa invariants for Calabi-Yau threefolds with an involution

We develop a theory of Gopakumar-Vafa (GV) invariants for a Calabi-Yau threefold (CY3) $X$ which is equipped with an involution $\imath$ preserving the holomorphic volume form. We define integers $n_{g,h}(β) $ which give a virtual count of the number of genus $g$ curves $C$ on $X$, in the class $β\in H_{2}(X)$, which are invariant under $\imath$, and whose quotient $C/\imath$ has genus $h$. We give two definitions of $n_{g,h}(β) $ which we conjecture to be equivalent: one in terms of a version of Pandharipande-Thomas theory and one in terms of a version of Maulik-Toda theory. We compute our invariants and give evidence for our conjecture in several cases. In particular, we compute our invariants when $X=S\times \mathbb{C}$ where $S$ is an Abelian surface with $\imath (a)=-a$ or a $K3$ surface with a symplectic involution (a Nikulin $K3$ surface). For these cases, we give formulas for our invariants in terms of Jacobi modular forms. For the Abelian surface case, the specialization of our invariants $n_{g,h}(β) $ to $h=0$ recovers the count of hyperelliptic curves on an Abelian surface first computed by Bryan-Oberdieck-Pandharipande-Yin.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.