Paper detail

Counting cliques and clique covers in random graphs

We study the problem of counting the number of {\em isomorphic} copies of a given {\em template} graph, say $H$, in the input {\em base} graph, say $G$. In general, it is believed that polynomial time algorithms that solve this problem exactly are unlikely to exist. So, a lot of work has gone into designing efficient {\em approximation schemes}, especially, when $H$ is a perfect matching. In this work, we present efficient approximation schemes to count $k$-Cliques, $k$-Independent sets and $k$-Clique covers in random graphs. We present {\em fully polynomial time randomized approximation schemes} (fpras) to count $k$-Cliques and $k$-Independent sets in a random graph on $n$ vertices when $k$ is at most $(1+o(1))\log n$, and $k$-Clique covers when $k$ is a constant. [Grimmett and McDiarmid, 1975] present a simple greedy algorithm that {\em detects} a clique (independent set) of size $(1+o(1))\log_2 n$ in $G\in \mathcal{G}(n,\frac{1}{2})$ with high probability. No algorithm is known to detect a clique or an independent set of larger size with non-vanishing probability. Furthermore, [Coja-Oghlan and Efthymiou, 2011] present some evidence that one cannot hope to easily improve a similar, almost 40 years old bound for sparse random graphs. Therefore, our results are unlikely to be easily improved. We use a novel approach to obtain a recurrence corresponding to the variance of each estimator. Then we upper bound the variance using the corresponding recurrence. This leads us to obtain a polynomial upper bound on the critical ratio. As an aside, we also obtain an alternate derivation of the closed form expression for the $k$-th moment of a binomial random variable using our techniques. The previous derivation [Knoblauch (2008)] was based on the moment generating function of a binomial random variable.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.