Paper detail

Counting arcs in $\mathbb F_q^2$

An arc in $\mathbb F_q^2$ is a set $P \subset \mathbb F_q^2$ such that no three points of $P$ are collinear. We use the method of hypergraph containers to prove several counting results for arcs. Let $\mathcal A(q)$ denote the family of all arcs in $\mathbb F_q^2$. Our main result is the bound \[ |\mathcal A(q)| \leq 2^{(1+o(1))q}. \] This matches, up to the factor hidden in the $o(1)$ notation, the trivial lower bound that comes from considering all subsets of an arc of size $q$. We also give upper bounds for the number of arcs of a fixed (large) size. Let $k=q^t$ for some $t >2/3$, and let $\mathcal A(q,k)$ denote the family of all arcs in $\mathbb F_q^2$ with cardinality $k$. We prove that, for all $γ>0$ \[ |\mathcal A(q,k)| \leq \binom{(1+γ)q}{k}. \] This result improves a bound of Roche-Newton and Warren. A nearly matching lower bound \[ |\mathcal A(q,k)| \geq \binom{q}{k} \] follows by considering all subsets of size $k$ of an arc of size $q$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.