Counting and packing Hamilton ℓ\ell-cycles in dense hypergraphs

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Abstract

We consider problems about packing and counting Hamilton ℓ\ell-cycles in hypergraphs of large minimum degree. Given a hypergraph H\mathcal H, for a dd-subset A⊆V(H)A\subseteq V(\mathcal H), we denote by dH(A)d_{\mathcal H}(A) the number of distinct \emph{edges} f∈E(H)f\in E(\mathcal H) for which A⊆fA\subseteq f, and set δd(H)δ_d(\mathcal H) to be the minimum dH(A)d_{\mathcal H}(A) over all A⊆V(H)A\subseteq V(\mathcal H) of size dd. We show that if a kk-uniform hypergraph on nn vertices H\mathcal H satisfies δk−1(H)≥αnδ_{k-1}(\mathcal H)\geq αn for some α>1/2α>1/2, then for every ℓ<k/2\ell<k/2 H\mathcal H contains (1−o(1))n⋅n!⋅(αℓ!(k−2ℓ)!)nk−ℓ(1-o(1))^n\cdot n!\cdot \left(\fracα{\ell!(k-2\ell)!}\right)^{\frac{n}{k-\ell}} Hamilton ℓ\ell-cycles. The exponent above is easily seen to be optimal. In addition, we show that if δk−1(H)≥αnδ_{k-1}(\mathcal H)\geq αn for α>1/2α>1/2, then H\mathcal H contains f(α)nf(α)n edge-disjoint Hamilton ℓ\ell-cycles for an explicit function f(α)>0f(α)>0. For the case where every (k−1)(k-1)-tuple X⊂V(H)X\subset V({\mathcal H}) satisfies dH(X)∈(α±o(1))nd_{\mathcal H}(X)\in (α\pm o(1))n, we show that H\mathcal H contains edge-disjoint Haimlton ℓ\ell-cycles which cover all but o(∣E(H)∣)o\left(|E(\mathcal H)|\right) edges of H\mathcal H. As a tool we prove the following result which might be of independent interest: For a bipartite graph GG with both parts of size nn, with minimum degree at least δnδn, where δ>1/2δ>1/2, and for p=ω(log⁡n/n)p=ω(\log n/n) the following holds. If GG contains an rr-factor for r=Θ(n)r=Θ(n), then by retaining edges of GG with probability pp independently at random, w.h.p the resulting graph contains a (1−o(1))rp(1-o(1))rp-factor.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.