Paper detail

Counting 3-Stack-Sortable Permutations

We prove a "decomposition lemma" that allows us to count preimages of certain sets of permutations under West's stack-sorting map $s$. As a first application, we give a new proof of Zeilberger's formula for the number of 2-stack-sortable permutations in $S_n$. Our proof generalizes, allowing us to find an algebraic equation satisfied by the generating function that counts 2-stack-sortable permutations according to length, number of descents, and number of peaks. The same method yields a recurrence relation for $W_3(n)$, the number of 3-stack-sortable permutations in $S_n$. We compute $W_3(n)$ for $n\le 174$, extending the 13 terms of this sequence that were known before. We also prove the first nontrivial lower bound for $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}W_3(n)^{1/n}$. Invoking a result of Kremer, we also prove that $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}W_t(n)^{1/n}\geq(\sqrt{t}+1)^2$ for all $t\geq 1$, which we use to improve a result of Smith. Our computations allow us to disprove a conjecture of Bóna, although we do not yet know for sure which one. We can refine our methods to obtain a recurrence for the number of 3-stack-sortable permutations in $S_n$ with $k$ descents and $p$ peaks. This produces a large amount of evidence supporting a real-rootedness conjecture of Bóna. Using part of the theory of valid hook configurations, we give a new proof of a $γ$-nonnegativity result of Brändén, which in turn implies an older result of Bóna. We then answer a question of the current author by producing a set $A\subseteq S_{11}$ such that $\sum_{σ\in s^{-1}(A)}x^{\text{des}(σ)}$ has nonreal roots. We interpret this as partial evidence against the same real-rootedness conjecture of Bóna that we found evidence supporting. Examining the parities of the numbers $W_3(n)$, we obtain strong evidence against yet another conjecture of Bóna. We end with some conjectures of our own.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.