Paper detail

Counterintuitive properties of fixation probability and fixation time in population structures with spatially periodic resource distribution

Resource are often not uniformly distributed within a population. Spatial variations of concentration of a resource, change the fitness of competing strategies locally. The notion of fitness varying with respect to both genotype and environment is important in modeling cancer initiation, microbial evolution and evolution of drug resistance. Environmental interactions can be asymmetric, that is, they affect the fitness of one type more than the other. The question is how local environmental variations in network population structures change the selection dynamics in a finite population setting. We consider one-dimensional lattice population structures with spatial fitness distributions with a periodic pattern. Heterogeneity is determined by standard deviation of fitnesses and period. The model covers biologically relevant limits of two-habitat subdivided populations and randomly-distributed resources in high- and low-periods. We numerically calculate fixation probability and fixation times for a constant population birth-death process as fitness heterogeneity and period vary. We identify levels of heterogeneity for which a previously deleterious mutant, in a uniform environment, becomes beneficial. In other regimes of the problem we observe unexpected behavior where the fixation probability of both types are larger than their neutral value at the same time. This coincides with an exponential increase in time to fixation as a function of population size, which points to significant slow-down in selection process and the potential for coexistence between types in realistic time scales. We also discuss `fitness shift' model where the fitness function of one type is identical to the other up to a constant spatial shift. This leads to significant increase (or decrease) in the fixation probability of the mutant depending the value of the shift.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.