Paper detail

Counterexamples for high-degree generalizations of the Schrödinger maximal operator

In 1980 Carleson posed a question on the minimal regularity of an initial data function in a Sobolev space $H^s(\mathbb{R}^n)$ that implies pointwise convergence for the solution of the linear Schrödinger equation. After progress by many authors, this was recently resolved (up to the endpoint) by Bourgain, whose counterexample construction for the Schrödinger maximal operator proved a necessary condition on the regularity, and Du and Zhang, who proved a sufficient condition. Analogues of Carleson's question remain open for many other dispersive PDE's. We develop a flexible new method to approach such problems, and prove that for any integer $k\geq 2$, if a degree $k$ generalization of the Schrödinger maximal operator is bounded from $H^s(\mathbb{R}^n)$ to $L^1(B_n(0,1))$, then $s \geq \frac{1}{4} + \frac{n-1}{4((k-1)n+1)}.$ In dimensions $n \geq 2$, for every degree $k \geq 3$, this is the first result that exceeds a long-standing barrier at $1/4$. Our methods are number-theoretic, and in particular apply the Weil bound, a consequence of the truth of the Riemann Hypothesis over finite fields.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.