Paper detail

Coulomb-blockade-induced bound quasiparticle states in a double-island qubit

We study the low temperature thermodynamic properties of a superconducting double-island qubit. For an odd number of electrons in the device, the ground state corresponds to the intrinsic quasiparticle bound to the tunneling contact. The ground state is separated from the continuum of excited states by a finite gap of order of the Josephson energy E_J. The presence of the bound quasiparticle state results in a nonmonotonic temperature dependence of the width of the transition region between Coulomb blockade plateaus. The minimum width occurs at the ionization temperature of the bound state, T_i\sim E_J/\ln(\sqrt{ΔE_J}/δ), with Δand δbeing respectively the superconducting gap and single particle mean level spacing in the island. For an even number of electrons in the system, we show that the Coulomb enhancement of the Josephson energy can be significantly stronger than that in the case of a single grain coupled to a superconducting lead. If the electrostatic energy favors a single broken Cooper pair, the resulting quasiparticles are bound to the contact with an energy that is exponentially small in the inverse dimensionless conductance.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.