Paper detail

Could the Supersymmetric Higgs Particles Naturally be Pseudo-Goldstone Bosons?

The doublet-triplet splitting problem is perhaps the most problematic aspect of supersymmetric grand unified theories. It can be argued that the most natural reason for the Higgs doublets to be light is that they are pseudo-Goldstone bosons associated with the spontaneous breakdown of an accidental global symmetry. In this paper we discuss the possibility of implementing this idea in the SU(6) model of refs. \cite{Zur,Bar2,Bar3,Bar4}. We show that although it is simple to generate an accidental symmetry of the renormalizable terms of the potential, it is quite difficult to construct a model which allows for the preservation of the accidental symmetry in the nonrenormalizable terms. We summarize the constraints on such models and then give three different ways to construct a superpotential where the dangerous mixing terms are sufficiently suppressed even in the presence of nonrenormalizable operators. With these examples we demonstrate the existence of consistent models implementing the Higgs as pseudo-Goldstone boson scheme. We extend one of the three examples to include fermion masses. We also show that when restricted to regular group embeddings the only possible models without light triplets are trivial generalizations of the SU(6) model we consider.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.