Paper detail

Could the Compact Radio Sources in M82 be Cluster Wind Driven Bubbles?

The compact non-thermal sources in M82 and other starburst galaxies are generally thought to be supernova remnants (SNRs). We consider an alternative hypothesis that most are wind driven bubbles (WDBs) associated with very young super star clusters (SSCs). In this scenario, the synchrotron emitting particles are produced at the site of the shock transition between the cluster wind and the hot bubble gas. The particles radiate in the strong magnetic field produced in the expanding shell of shocked ambient interstellar gas. One of the motivations for this hypothesis is the lack of observed time variability in most of the sources, implying ages greater than expected for SNRs, but comfortably within the range for WDBs. In addition, as SNRs, these sources are not effective in driving the starburst mass outflow associated with the nuclear region of M82, thus requiring a separate mechanism for coupling SN energy to this outflow. The WDB hypothesis is found to be feasible for underlying clusters in the mass range ~2x10^(4+/-1)Msun, and ambient gas densities in the range ~3x10^(3+/-1)cm^-3. The ages of the bubbles are between several x10^3 and several x10^4 years. Since the SNR picture cannont be ruled out, we provide suggestions for specific observational tests which could confirm or rule out the WDB hypothesis. Finally, we discuss the WDB hypothesis in the context of broader phenomena in M82, such as the rate of star formation and starburst outflows, and the possible interpretation of supershells in M82 as the products of multiple supernovae in young SSCs.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.