Paper detail

COSPEDTree-II: Improved Couplet based Phylogenetic Supertree

A Supertree synthesizes the topologies of a set of phylogenetic trees carrying overlapping taxa set. In process, conflicts in the tree topologies are aimed to be resolved with the consensus clades. Such a problem is proved to be NP-hard. Various heuristics on local search, maximum parsimony, graph cut, etc. lead to different supertree approaches, of which the most popular methods are based on analyzing fixed size subtree topologies (such as triplets or quartets). Time and space complexities of these methods, however, depend on the subtree size considered. Our earlier proposed supertree method COSPEDTree, uses evolutionary relationship among individual couplets (taxa pair), to produce slightly conservative (not fully resolved) supertrees. Here we propose its improved version COSPEDTree-II, which produces better resolved supertree with lower number of missing branches, and incurs much lower running time. Results on biological datasets show that COSPEDTree-II belongs to the category of high performance and computationally efficient supertree methods.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.