Paper detail

Cosmology with weak-lensing peak counts

Weak gravitational lensing (WL) causes distortions of galaxy images and probes massive structures on large scales, allowing us to understand the late-time evolution of the Universe. One way to extract the cosmological information from WL is to use peak statistics. Peaks are tracers of massive halos and therefore probe the mass function. They retain non-Gaussian information and have already been shown as a promising tool to constrain cosmology. In this work, we develop a new model to predict WL peak counts. The model generates fast simulations based on halo sampling and selects peaks from the derived lensing maps. This approach has three main advantages. First, the model is very fast: only several seconds are required to perform a realization. Second, including realistic conditions is straightforward. Third, the model provides the full distribution information because of its stochasticity. We show that our model agrees well with N-body simulations. Then, we study the impacts of the cosmology-dependent covariance on constraints and explore different parameter inference methods. A special focus is put on approximate Bayesian computation (ABC), an accept-reject sampler without the need to estimate the likelihood. We show that ABC is able to yield robust constraints with much reduced time costs. Several filtering techniques are studied to improve the extraction of multiscale information. Finally, the new model is applied to the CFHTLenS, KiDS DR1/2, and DES SV data sets. Our preliminary results agree with the Planck constraints assuming the Lambda-CDM model. Overall, this thesis forges an innovative tool for future WL surveys. The manuscript provides a brief review on WL peak counts.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.