Paper detail

Cosmology: the search for twenty-four (or more) functions

We enumerate the 4(1+F)+2S independent arbitrary functions of space require to describe a general relativistic cosmology containing an arbitrary number of non-interacting fluid (F) and scalar fields (S). Results are also given for arbitrary space dimension and for higher-order gravity theories, where the number increases to 16+4F+2S. Both counts are subject to assumptions about whether the dark energy is a cosmological constant. A more detailed analysis is provided when global homogeneity is assumed and the functions become constants. This situation is also studied in the case where the flat and open universes have compact spatial topologies. This changes the relative generalities significantly and places new constraints on the types of expansion anisotropy that are permitted. The most general compact homogeneous universes containing Friedmann models are spatially flat and described by 8+4F+2S constants. Comparisons are made with the simple 6-parameter lambda-CDM model and physical interpretations provided for the parameters needed to describe the most general cosmological models.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.