Paper detail

Cosmology from XMM High-Z AGN Clustering

We review the high-redshift X-ray selected AGN clustering, based on the XMM/2dF survey, and compare it with other recent XMM-based results. Using the recent Hasinger et al. (2005) and La Franca et al. (2005) luminosity functions we find that the spatial clustering lengths, derived using Limber's inversion equation, are $\sim 17$ and 20 $h^{-1}$ Mpc for the soft and hard band sources while their median redshifts are ${\bar z}\sim 1.2$ and 0.8, respectively. The corresponding bias factors at $z=\bar{z}$ are $\sim 5.3\pm 0.9$ and $\sim 5.1\pm1.1$, respectively. Within the framework of a flat cosmological model we find that our results support a model with $Ω_m \simeq 0.26$, $σ_8\simeq 0.75$, $h\simeq 0.72$, w$\simeq -0.9$ (in excellent agreement with the 3 year WMAP results). We also find the present day bias of X-ray AGNs to be $b_{\circ}\sim 2$.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.