Paper detail

Cosmology based on $f(R)$ gravity with ${\cal O}(1)$ eV sterile neutrino

We address the cosmological role of an additional ${\cal O}(1)$ eV sterile neutrino in modified gravity models. We confront the present cosmological data with predictions of the FLRW cosmological model based on a variant of $f(R)$ modified gravity proposed by one of the authors previously. This viable cosmological model which deviation from general relativity with a cosmological constant $Λ$ decreases as $R^{-2n}$ for large, but not too large values of the Ricci scalar $R$ provides an alternative explanation of present dark energy and the accelerated expansion of the Universe. Various up-to-date cosmological data sets exploited include Planck CMB anisotropy, CMB lensing potential, BAO, cluster mass function and Hubble constant measurements. We find that the CMB+BAO constraints strongly the sum of neutrino masses from above. This excludes values $λ\sim 1$ for which distinctive cosmological features of the model are mostly pronounced as compared to the $Λ$CDM model, since then free streaming damping of perturbations due to neutrino rest masses is not sufficient to compensate their extra growth occurring in $f(R)$ gravity. Thus, we obtain $λ>8.2$ ($2σ$) with cluster systematics and $λ>9.4$ ($2σ$) without that. In the latter case we find for the sterile neutrino mass $0.47\,\,\rm{eV}$$\,<\,$$m_{ν,\,\rm{sterile}}$$\,<\,$$1\,\,\rm{eV}$ ($2σ$) assuming the active neutrinos are massless, not significantly larger than in the standard $Λ$CDM with the same data set: $0.45\,\,\rm{eV}$$\,<\,$$m_{ν,\,\rm{sterile}}$$\,<\,$$0.92\,\,\rm{eV}$ ($2σ$). However, a possible discovery of a sterile neutrino with the mass $m_{ν,\,\rm{sterile}} \approx 1.5\,$eV motivated by various anomalies in neutrino oscillation experiments would favor cosmology based on $f(R)$ gravity rather than the $Λ$CDM model.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.