Cosmology and Astrophysics from Relaxed Galaxy Clusters V: Consistency with Cold Dark Matter Structure Formation

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

This is the fifth in a series of papers studying the astrophysics and cosmology of massive, dynamically relaxed galaxy clusters. Our sample comprises 40 clusters identified as being dynamically relaxed and hot in Papers I and II of this series. Here we use constraints on cluster mass profiles from X-ray data to test some of the basic predictions of cosmological structure formation in the Cold Dark Matter (CDM) paradigm. We present constraints on the concentration--mass relation for massive clusters, finding a power-law mass dependence with a slope of κm=−0.16±0.07κ_m=-0.16\pm0.07, in agreement with CDM predictions. For this relaxed sample, the relation is consistent with a constant as a function of redshift (power-law slope with 1+z1+z of κζ=−0.17±0.26κ_ζ=-0.17\pm0.26), with an intrinsic scatter of σln⁡c=0.16±0.03σ_{\ln c}=0.16\pm0.03. We investigate the shape of cluster mass profiles over the radial range probed by the data (typically ∼50\sim50kpc--1Mpc), and test for departures from the simple Navarro, Frenk & White (NFW) form, for which the logarithmic slope of the density profile tends to −1-1 at small radii. Specifically, we consider as alternatives the generalized NFW (GNFW) and Einasto parametrizations. For the GNFW model, we find an average value of (minus) the logarithmic inner slope of β=1.02±0.08β=1.02\pm0.08, with an intrinsic scatter of σβ=0.22±0.07σ_β=0.22\pm0.07, while in the Einasto case we constrain the average shape parameter to be α=0.29±0.04α=0.29\pm0.04 with an intrinsic scatter of σα=0.12±0.04σ_α=0.12\pm0.04. Our results are thus consistent with the simple NFW model on average, but we clearly detect the presence of intrinsic, cluster-to-cluster scatter about the average.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.