Paper detail

Cosmological Tests Using GRBs, the Star Formation Rate and Possible Abundance Evolution

The principal goal of this paper is to use attempts at reconciling the Swift long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) with the star formation history (SFH) to compare the predictions of $Λ$CDM with those in the $R_{\rm h}=ct$ Universe. In the context of the former, we confirm that the latest Swift sample of GRBs reveals an increasing evolution in the GRB rate relative to the star formation rate (SFR) at high redshifts. The observed discrepancy between the GRB rate and the SFR may be eliminated by assuming a modest evolution parameterized as $(1+z)^{0.8}$---perhaps indicating a cosmic evolution in metallicity. However, we find a higher metallicity cut of $Z=0.52Z_{\odot}$ than was seen in previous studies, which suggested that LGRBs occur preferentially in metal poor environments, i.e., $Z\sim0.1-0.3Z_{\odot}$. We use a simple power-law approximation to the high-\emph{z} ($\ga 3.8$) SFH, i.e., $R_{\rm SF}\propto[(1+z)/4.8]^α$, to examine how the high-\emph{z} SFR may be impacted by a possible abundance evolution in the Swift GRB sample. For an expansion history consistent with $Λ$CDM, we find that the Swift redshift and luminosity distributions can be reproduced with reasonable accuracy if $α=-2.41_{-2.09}^{+1.87}$. For the $R_{\rm h}=ct$ Universe, the GRB rate is slightly different from that in $Λ$CDM, but also requires an extra evolutionary effect, with a metallicity cut of $Z=0.44Z_{\odot}$. Assuming that the SFR and GRB rate are related via an evolving metallicity, we find that the GRB data constrain the slope of the high-\emph{z} SFR in $R_{\rm h}=ct$ to be $α=-3.60_{-2.45}^{+2.45}$. Both cosmologies fit the GRB/SFR data rather well.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.