Cosmological Parameters Degeneracies and Non-Gaussian Halo Bias

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Abstract

We study the impact of the cosmological parameters uncertainties on the measurements of primordial non-Gaussianity through the large-scale non-Gaussian halo bias effect. While this is not expected to be an issue for the standard LCDM model, it may not be the case for more general models that modify the large-scale shape of the power spectrum. We consider the so-called local non-Gaussianity model and forecasts from planned surveys, alone and combined with a Planck CMB prior. In particular, we consider EUCLID- and LSST-like surveys and forecast the correlations among fNLf_{\rm NL} and the running of the spectral index αsα_s, the dark energy equation of state ww, the effective sound speed of dark energy perturbations cs2c^2_s, the total mass of massive neutrinos Mν=∑mνM_ν=\sum m_ν, and the number of extra relativistic degrees of freedom NνrelN_ν^{rel}. Neglecting CMB information on fNLf_{\rm NL} and scales k>0.03hk > 0.03 h/Mpc, we find that, if NνrelN_ν^{\rm rel} is assumed to be known, the uncertainty on cosmological parameters increases the error on fNLf_{\rm NL} by 10 to 30% depending on the survey. Thus the fNLf_{\rm NL} constraint is remarkable robust to cosmological model uncertainties. On the other hand, if NνrelN_ν^{\rm rel} is simultaneously constrained from the data, the fNLf_{\rm NL} error increases by ∼80\sim 80%. Finally, future surveys which provide a large sample of galaxies or galaxy clusters over a volume comparable to the Hubble volume can measure primordial non-Gaussianity of the local form with a marginalized 1--σσ error of the order ΔfNL∼2−5Δf_{\rm NL} \sim 2-5, after combination with CMB priors for the remaining cosmological parameters. These results are competitive with CMB bispectrum constraints achievable with an ideal CMB experiment.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.