Paper detail

Cosmological Parameters Degeneracies and Non-Gaussian Halo Bias

We study the impact of the cosmological parameters uncertainties on the measurements of primordial non-Gaussianity through the large-scale non-Gaussian halo bias effect. While this is not expected to be an issue for the standard LCDM model, it may not be the case for more general models that modify the large-scale shape of the power spectrum. We consider the so-called local non-Gaussianity model and forecasts from planned surveys, alone and combined with a Planck CMB prior. In particular, we consider EUCLID- and LSST-like surveys and forecast the correlations among $f_{\rm NL}$ and the running of the spectral index $α_s$, the dark energy equation of state $w$, the effective sound speed of dark energy perturbations $c^2_s$, the total mass of massive neutrinos $M_ν=\sum m_ν$, and the number of extra relativistic degrees of freedom $N_ν^{rel}$. Neglecting CMB information on $f_{\rm NL}$ and scales $k > 0.03 h$/Mpc, we find that, if $N_ν^{\rm rel}$ is assumed to be known, the uncertainty on cosmological parameters increases the error on $f_{\rm NL}$ by 10 to 30% depending on the survey. Thus the $f_{\rm NL}$ constraint is remarkable robust to cosmological model uncertainties. On the other hand, if $N_ν^{\rm rel}$ is simultaneously constrained from the data, the $f_{\rm NL}$ error increases by $\sim 80%$. Finally, future surveys which provide a large sample of galaxies or galaxy clusters over a volume comparable to the Hubble volume can measure primordial non-Gaussianity of the local form with a marginalized 1--$σ$ error of the order $Δf_{\rm NL} \sim 2-5$, after combination with CMB priors for the remaining cosmological parameters. These results are competitive with CMB bispectrum constraints achievable with an ideal CMB experiment.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.