Paper detail

Cosmological Parameters and Neutrino Masses from the Final Planck and Full-Shape BOSS Data

We present a joint analysis of the Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) and Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) final data releases. A key novelty of our study is the use of a new full-shape (FS) likelihood for the redshift-space galaxy power spectrum of the BOSS data, based on an improved perturbation theory template. We show that the addition of the redshift space galaxy clustering measurements breaks degeneracies present in the CMB data alone and tightens constraints on cosmological parameters. Assuming the minimal $Λ$CDM cosmology with massive neutrinos, we find the following late-Universe parameters: the Hubble constant \mbox{$H_0=67.95^{+0.66}_{-0.52}$ km s$^{-1}$Mpc$^{-1}$}, the matter density fraction \mbox{$Ω_m=0.3079^{+0.0065}_{-0.0085}\,$}, the mass fluctuation amplitude \mbox{$σ_8=0.8087_{-0.0072}^{+0.012}\,$}, and an upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses \mbox{$M_{\text{tot}} <0.16\,$ eV} ($95\%$ CL).This can be contrasted with the Planck-only measurements: \mbox{$H_0=67.14_{-0.72}^{+1.3}$} km s$^{-1}$Mpc$^{-1}$, $Ω_m=0.3188^{+0.0091}_{-0.016}\,$, \mbox{$σ_8=0.8053_{-0.0091}^{+0.019}\,$}, and \mbox{$M_{\text{tot}} <0.26\,$ eV} ($95\%$ CL). Our bound on the sum of neutrino masses relaxes once the hierarchy-dependent priors from the oscillation experiments are imposed. The addition of the new FS likelihood also constrains the effective number of extra relativistic degrees of freedom, \mbox{$N_{\text{eff}}=2.88\pm 0.17$}. Our study shows that the current FS and the pure baryon acoustic oscillation data add a similar amount of information in combination with the Planck likelihood. We argue that this is just a coincidence given the BOSS volume and efficiency of the current reconstruction algorithms.In the era of future surveys FS will play a dominant role in cosmological parameter measurements.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.