Abstract

We propose a light-weight deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to estimate the cosmological parameters from simulated 3-dimensional dark matter distributions with high accuracy. The training set is based on 465 realizations of a cubic box with a side length of 256 h−1 Mpc256\ h^{-1}\ \rm Mpc, sampled with 1283128^3 particles interpolated over a cubic grid of 1283128^3 voxels. These volumes have cosmological parameters varying within the flat ΛΛCDM parameter space of 0.16≤Ωm≤0.460.16 \leq Ω_m \leq 0.46 and 2.0≤109As≤2.32.0 \leq 10^9 A_s \leq 2.3. The neural network takes as an input cubes with 32332^3 voxels and has three convolution layers, three dense layers, together with some batch normalization and pooling layers. In the final predictions from the network we find a 2.5%2.5\% bias on the primordial amplitude σ8σ_8 that can not easily be resolved by continued training. We correct this bias to obtain unprecedented accuracy in the cosmological parameter estimation with statistical uncertainties of δΩmδΩ_m=0.0015 and δσ8δσ_8=0.0029, which are several times better than the results of previous CNN works. Compared with a 2-point analysis method using clustering region of 0-130 and 10-130 h−1h^{-1} Mpc, the CNN constraints are several times and an order of magnitude more precise, respectively. Finally, we conduct preliminary checks of the error-tolerance abilities of the neural network, and find that it exhibits robustness against smoothing, masking, random noise, global variation, rotation, reflection, and simulation resolution. Those effects are well understood in typical clustering analysis, but had not been tested before for the CNN approach. Our work shows that CNN can be more promising than people expected in deriving tight cosmological constraints from the cosmic large scale structure.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.