Paper detail

Cosmological parameter estimation from large-scale structure deep learning

We propose a light-weight deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to estimate the cosmological parameters from simulated 3-dimensional dark matter distributions with high accuracy. The training set is based on 465 realizations of a cubic box with a side length of $256\ h^{-1}\ \rm Mpc$, sampled with $128^3$ particles interpolated over a cubic grid of $128^3$ voxels. These volumes have cosmological parameters varying within the flat $Λ$CDM parameter space of $0.16 \leq Ω_m \leq 0.46$ and $2.0 \leq 10^9 A_s \leq 2.3$. The neural network takes as an input cubes with $32^3$ voxels and has three convolution layers, three dense layers, together with some batch normalization and pooling layers. In the final predictions from the network we find a $2.5\%$ bias on the primordial amplitude $σ_8$ that can not easily be resolved by continued training. We correct this bias to obtain unprecedented accuracy in the cosmological parameter estimation with statistical uncertainties of $δΩ_m$=0.0015 and $δσ_8$=0.0029, which are several times better than the results of previous CNN works. Compared with a 2-point analysis method using clustering region of 0-130 and 10-130 $h^{-1}$ Mpc, the CNN constraints are several times and an order of magnitude more precise, respectively. Finally, we conduct preliminary checks of the error-tolerance abilities of the neural network, and find that it exhibits robustness against smoothing, masking, random noise, global variation, rotation, reflection, and simulation resolution. Those effects are well understood in typical clustering analysis, but had not been tested before for the CNN approach. Our work shows that CNN can be more promising than people expected in deriving tight cosmological constraints from the cosmic large scale structure.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.