Paper detail

Cosmological parameter estimation from CMB and X-ray clusters after Planck

We update the cosmological parameter estimation for three non-vanilla models by a joint analysis of \CCCP\ X-ray cluster, the newly released \Planck\ CMB data as well as some external data sets, such as baryon acoustic oscillation measurements from the 6dFGS, SDSS DR7 and BOSS DR9 surveys, and Hubble Space Telescope $H_0$ measurement. First of all, we find that X-ray cluster data sets strongly favor a non-zero summed neutrino mass at more than 3$σ$ confidence level in these non-vanilla models. And then, we reveal some tensions between X-ray cluster and {\it Planck} data in some cosmological parameters. For the matter power spectrum amplitude $σ_8$, X-ray cluster data favor a lower value compared with {\it Planck}. Because of the strong $σ_8-\sum m_ν$ degeneracy, this tension could beyond 2$σ$ confidence level when the summed neutrino mass $\sum m_ν$ is allowed to vary. For the CMB lensing amplitude $A_L$, the addition of X-ray cluster data results in a 3$σ$ deviation from the vanilla model. Furthermore, {\it Planck}+X-ray data prefer a large Hubble constant and phantom-like dark energy equation of state, which are in $2σ$ tension with those from WMAP7+X-ray data. Finally, we find that these tensions/descrepencies could be relaxed in some sense by adding a $9\%$ systematic shift in the cluster mass functions.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.