Paper detail

Cosmological insights into the assembly of the radial and compact stellar halo of the Milky Way

Recent studies using Gaia DR2 have identified a massive merger in the history of the Milky Way (MW) whose debris is markedly radial and counterrotating. This event, known as the Gaia-Enceladus/Gaia-Sausage (GE/GS), is also hypothesized to have built the majority of the inner stellar halo. We use the cosmological hydrodynamic simulation Illustris to place this merger in the context of galaxy assembly within $Λ$CDM. From $\sim$150 MW analogs, $\sim 80 \%$ have experienced at least one merger of similar mass and infall time as GE/GS. Within this sample, 37 have debris as radial as that of the GE/GS, which we dub the Ancient Radial Mergers (ARMs). Counterrotation is not rare among ARMs, with $43 \%$ having $>40 \%$ of their debris in counterrotating orbits. However, the compactness inferred for the GE/GS debris, given its large $β$ and its substantial contribution to the stellar halo, is more difficult to reproduce. The median radius of ARM debris is r$_{*,deb}\simeq 45$kpc, while GE/GS is thought to be mostly contained within $r\sim 30$ kpc. For most MW analogs, a few mergers are required to build the inner stellar halo, and ARM debris only accounts for $\sim 12 \%$ of inner accreted stars. Encouragingly, we find one ARM that is both compact and dominates the inner halo of its central, making it our best GE/GS analog. Interestingly, this merger deposits a significant number of stars (M$_*\simeq1.5 \times 10^9 M_\odot$) in the outer halo, suggesting that an undiscovered section of GE/GS may await detection.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.