Paper detail

Cosmological information in Gaussianised weak lensing signals

We investigate the information on cosmology contained in Gaussianised weak gravitational lensing convergence fields. Employing Box-Cox transformations to determine optimal transformations to Gaussianity, we develop analytical models for the transformed power spectrum, including effects of noise and smoothing. We find that optimised Box-Cox transformations perform substantially better than an offset logarithmic transformation in Gaussianising the convergence, but both yield very similar results for the signal-to-noise and parameter constraints. None of the transformations is capable of eliminating correlations of the power spectra between different angular frequencies, which we demonstrate to have a significant impact on the errors on cosmology. Analytic models of the Gaussianised power spectrum yield good fits to the simulations and produce unbiased parameter estimates in the majority of cases, where the exceptions can be traced back to the limitations in modelling the higher-order correlations of the original convergence. In the idealistic case, without galaxy shape noise, we find an increase in cumulative signal-to-noise by a factor of 2.6 for angular frequencies up to 1500, and a decrease in the area of the confidence region in the Omega_m-sigma_8 plane by a factor of 4.4 in terms of q-values for the best-performing transformation. When adding a realistic level of shape noise, all transformations perform poorly with little decorrelation of angular frequencies, a maximum increase in signal-to-noise of 34%, and even marginally degraded errors on cosmological parameters. We argue that, to find Gaussianising transformations of practical use, one will need to go beyond transformations of the one-point distribution of the convergence, extend the analysis deeper into the non-linear regime, and resort to an exploration of parameter space via simulations. (abridged)

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.