Paper detail

Cosmological information content in redshift-space power spectrum of SDSS-like galaxies in the quasi-nonlinear regime up to $k=0.3\,h\,$Mpc$^{-1}$

Clustering properties and peculiar velocities of halos in large-scale structure carry a wealth of cosmological information over a wide range of scales from linear to nonlinear scales. We use halo catalogs in a suite of high-resolution $N$-body simulations to construct mock catalogs of galaxies that resemble the SDSS-like luminous early-type galaxies at three redshift bins in the range $0.15\le z\le 0.7$. To do this we include 10 nuisance parameters to model variations in halo-galaxy connections for each redshift bin; the halo occupation distribution, and the spatial and velocity distributions of galaxies in the host halos. We evaluate the Fisher information matrix for the redshift-space power spectrum of SDSS-like galaxies using different sets of the mock catalogs that are generated from changes in each of model parameters; cosmological parameters ($σ_8$ and $Ω_{\rm m}$), the halo-galaxy connection parameters, and the cosmological distances ($D_{\rm A}$ and $H$ parameters at each redshift bin) for modeling an apparent geometrical distortion of the redshift-space power spectrum (the Alcock-Paczynski effect). We show that combining the monopole and quadrupole power spectra of galaxies allows for accurate estimations of the cosmological parameters and the cosmological distances, even after marginalization over the halo-galaxy parameters, by lifting the parameter degeneracies that are otherwise inevitable if either of the two spectra alone is used. When including the galaxy power spectrum information up to $k=0.3\,h\,$Mpc$^{-1}$, we find about factor of 6 gain in the cosmological information content of ($σ_8,Ω_{\rm m},D_{\rm A}$'s and $H$'s) compared to $k=0.2\,h\,$Mpc$^{-1}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.